“Workers’ rights are a very serious matter”: this is how the video recorded and published on Instagram by Ilaria Salis begins, who in recent hours has been discussed for being ordered to pay over 300,000 euros in compensation for having dismissed two of her collaborators “without just cause”. “Given the often impartial or incomplete news circulating in these hours, I want to clarify – continued the Avs MEP -. With great transparency, I want to tell you how things really went and answer the questions that many people understandably and rightly are asking me. To the defamer, however, I want to remind them that there will be no tolerance for instrumentalizations or mystifications of the matter”.
Read more Alberto Stefani, the governor speaks: «With Autonomy, Veneto and Lega win» | Libero Quotidiano.it
Salis then went into detail about the matter: “Why was I condemned for having terminated the collaboration relationship with two assistants? The answer is found in the first-instance judgment. For a very simple reason: I was not present in court, and certainly not by my choice. In processes of this type, in fact, it is always up to the employer to demonstrate just cause, but I could not do so because I was innocently absent. This is not a definitive sentence, and when I was informed of it, months later, I filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal of more than 100 pages which contains the entire reconstruction of what happened and the documentation that I could not present at the first-instance trial. In the meantime, the Court of Appeal has suspended the executive effectiveness of the sentence, and now I am confident that the appeal process can bring full clarity to the matter”.
Read more Pd at school from the Duce: «Do as Mussolini, look at his shoulders» | Libero Quotidiano.it
Ilaria Salis condemned, Fratoianni’s broadside: “For us, this is a fixed point”
“For the Green and Left Alliance, respect for judicial rulings, and even more so for the rights of w…
The attempt to justify herself then continued: “During the trial, I was not present in court, but certainly not by my choice. I wasn’t there because I had never been informed of the hearing. I didn’t even know that proceedings had been initiated against me. In this type of process, it is the opposing party that must take action to notify the documents, which essentially did not happen; in fact, they chose to have the document served on me by the judicial officer at my residence in Italy, and the notification never reached me. This first attempt at notification did not go well, and so, instead of sending me a certified email (PEC) or contacting me at my institutional contacts that they had used multiple times to communicate with me, they decided to use the procedure for untraceable persons. Doesn’t it seem absurd that an MEP, a public figure, is considered as if she were untraceable?”.
Read more Pd youth backtrack on out-of-town voting | Libero Quotidiano.it
