Who would benefit from the introduction of preferences in the new electoral law? Political scientist Salvatore Vassallo discusses it in Il Giorno: “It is legitimate to doubt that all those who call for its reintroduction really want to obtain it – he writes in the newspaper -. The convenience depends on the organizational structure of the parties and the characteristics of their electorates, which make internal competition on election day more or less manageable.” From this perspective, according to him, the decision of Fratelli d’Italia, the only major party, to vote both for the mediation built within the center-right and the Vannacci amendment should be read. “FdI – explains the expert – has a cohesive leadership group, controlled from above, made up of lieutenants of Giorgia Meloni well established in their respective territories, largely confident of seeing their role confirmed also in the challenge of preferences.”
Read more The Court of Auditors clashes with the government | Libero Quotidiano.it
The overturn on preferences in the Senate, on the other hand, would not be good news for the Movimento 5 Stelle of Giuseppe Conte, who “has a leadership group in the process of structuring – Vassallo points out -. With preferences, it would risk finding itself, as in the times of the ‘parlamentarie’, exposed to the entry, perhaps by a handful of votes, of meteors, eccentric and unpredictable figures.” Moving on to the PD, then, the expert notes that “the profile of candidates with the best chances of winning is well known: local administrators, media-known faces, representatives of recognizable internal areas, with their own circuits of consensus, not always aligned with the secretary, Elly Schlein, who understandably aims to change the leadership, to create a parliamentary group in her image, as already done with the national governing bodies of the party.”
Read more Pd, here is the latest politically correct battle: “person” instead of “man” | Libero Quotidiano.it
All the falsehoods about the new electoral law: why the reform is not unconstitutional
The new system does not violate the prerogatives of the head of state regarding the appointment of the prime minister:…
For the political scientist, therefore, the criticism of preferences “risks appearing hypocritical, especially if one considers that opposition leaders could have seriously challenged the majority by promoting – and possibly voting together with government parties, as they did regarding the vote of out-of-town voters – an amendment that imposed its reintroduction, but instead they withdrew it.”
Electoral law, Baldino’s blunder on La7: “Honorable, they wrote it before…”
“For us, we can go to vote even tomorrow. In fact, I hope so, but apparently…”. Vittoria Ba…