Ilaria Salis, convicted, does not want to pay 300 thousand euros | Libero Quotidiano.it

Mud flies, but Soumahoro’s boots – an illustrious predecessor in Avs – have nothing to do with it. Salis doesn’t want to pay and attacks her former collaborators. According to the Labor Court, she owes them 300,000 euros, 153,000 to Francois Gelmetti and 147,900 to Valentina Dadda, who were illegitimately dismissed. The Avs euro-prodigy retorts that she doesn’t intend to give them a cent, that the judges were wrong, and goes on the counterattack. In a social video more cut than the Amazon rainforest and which, by choice of colors and gestures, recalls Aboubakar’s – but at least the Ivorian wasn’t reading – the Bonelli&Fratoianni exponent says that her decision did not leave the collaborators «without means of subsistence» and – she emphasizes – «trust me, that’s not the case at all given their current work activity».

Read more Ilaria Salis, collaborators on the run: «Poor, but happier» | Libero Quotidiano.it

GRAND CANAL
It seems that Gelmetti helps Dadda, some acquaintances told Libero, in managing a villa that the girl’s father would rent in Venice, near the Rialto Bridge: «A cool place, four bedrooms, four bathrooms, two mega living rooms». But it has nothing to do with the possible illegitimate dismissal (the sentence is first instance): does a rich worker, assuming they are, not have the same rights as a poor worker? Oh dear, thinking about the wealth tax longed for by the left… Anyway, Salis too, patron saint of other people’s homes, comes from a well-off family: her father owns a 9-room villa in Castiadas (Cagliari); he has another co-ownership of 8 and a half rooms always in Sardinia, in Monserrato; in Cagliari, he is co-owner of a warehouse. Yet his daughter was convicted of invading buildings and preaches the occupation of vacant apartments.

Ilaria’s father also owns an 8-room house in Monza (where Ilaria has been residing for a few weeks) and is co-owner with his daughter of an additional 2.5-room apartment. Ilaria’s co-ownership share, in case of a final conviction and inability to pay the 300,000 euros, could be seized. This would be the last resort. First, according to the EU parliament’s regulations, 33% of her salary, about 6,000 euros per month, would be seized: the Secretary-General of the European Parliament would first have to listen to the person concerned, take into account the poverty threshold established by Eurostat for the Member’s State of residence (which we believe is still above it) and ensure that she can continue to exercise her mandate. The two local assistants were dismissed in February 2025, seven months after Salis’s proclamation, who accuses them of a series of shortcomings. Here’s the video again: «The rights of workers are a very serious matter (…) I remind defamers that there will be no tolerance.

Read more Ilaria Salis, the conspiracy theory by Mimmo Lucano: «There’s something behind it…» | Libero Quotidiano.it

I was convicted for a simple reason: I was not present in court and not by my choice. It is up to the employer to prove just cause» – exactly – «but I could not do so because I was innocently absent. When I was informed of the conviction, months later, I appealed. In the meantime, the Court of Appeal suspended the executive effectiveness of the sentence. I had not been informed, I did not know that the proceedings had been initiated. In these processes», she continues, «it is the opposing party that must take action to notify the documents, which did not happen. They decided to notify me of the act at my residence in Italy and the notification never reached me. Instead of sending me a certified email or contacting me at my institutional contacts that they had used multiple times to communicate (hadn’t she said she was unaware of everything? editor’s note) they decided to use the procedure for untraceable persons. Isn’t it absurd that a public figure is considered untraceable?». What happened was that the judicial officer did not find her twice at her residence address, where there wasn’t even a label on the doorbell. After changing residence (from Milan to Monza), she was able to be served the document.

BETRAYAL
She goes back on the attack: «Ending the relationship was right. They had followed my situation when I was in prison in Hungary. I believed they were doing it without ulterior motives, but as the months passed, I had the feeling that the relationship was being used more and more often to influence my decisions. Serious work deficiencies were added (…) which is why I chose an agreed solution: they replied that either we continued or we would end up in court. They also told me that they would ruin my public image in the newspapers». We find it impossible.

Read more Como, revolution: headers forbidden in youth teams | Libero Quotidiano.it