“It’s really hard to move forward like this,” comments disheartened Giorgia Meloni upon learning that a diligent judge in Turin released after a few hours a Bangladeshi citizen who had tried to assault a thirteen-year-old girl in a store. And the premier is right to feel a bit like Penelope, with the difference that she weaves a web by day – that of rigor and security – which then is regularly undone not by her but by others, like the Turin judge in question, for reasons unclear to whom it benefits. The assailant was released because, according to the Gip, he had shown to be “cooperative” despite the store’s cameras having captured a previous attempt with another girl.
Read more Mestre, yellow financing for the grand mosque: the Finance Police take action | Libero Quotidiano.it
Now the central issue is not what will happen to the maniac, who also holds a residence permit for “special protection” (it would be interesting to know from whom he needs protection besides himself) but what will happen to the magistrate responsible for such recklessness. And here we enter the black hole of magistrates’ self-governance on disciplinary matters that the justice reform rejected by Italians would have radically changed. Yes, because if everything goes as it always has, absolutely nothing will happen to the judge or something close to that, only for them to then pontificate “that this government does nothing for citizens’ security.”
The front opposing the justice reform – and the impunity of magistrates who err – imposed itself with the slogan “hands off the Constitution.” Fine, we continue to think that it is more important “hands off women, especially if they are young girls,” as is written in the Constitution itself, without hesitation or more or less ethnic excuses. Words are no longer enough here; facts are needed and needed immediately on both fronts (the assailant and the Gip with a big heart and little brain).
Read more Sigfrido Ranucci prepares the Report party: right after the strike… | Libero Quotidiano.it
